We would like to touch on Brooks Beast vs Adrenaline comparison in this article. Both running shoes are in the stability category of Brooks Running Shoes. However, their performance considering the stability/support & cushioning is not the same.
It is good to note that the Women’s counter part of Brooks Beast is the Ariel. There is no such a big differences between the Brooks Beast and Ariel except the size, weight and the women’s specific design needs. In this study, we compared the Brooks Beast 20 vs Adrenaline GTS 22, but same scenario and our verdict apply to Brooks Ariel 20 vs Adrenaline GTS 22 comparison as well.
Here is a table, we have put together to help you better understand the key differences for Brooks Beast 20 vs Adrenaline GTS 22 comparison:
|Comparison of #||Adrenaline GTS 22||Beast/Ariel 20|
|Our Selection for||Great Stability||Extreme Support|
|Feel||Balanced Cushioning (2/3)||Balanced Cushioning (2/3)|
|Flexibility||Moderate (3/5)||Stiff (1/5)|
|Camparest Expert Review||In-depth Review||In-depth Review|
|Deals & Discounts||Rates Men’s / Women’s||Rates Men’s / Women’s|
The main difference between Brooks Beast 20 and Adrenaline GTS 22 is the midsole design and the cushioning. The Brooks Beast 20 offers additional midsole support and cushioning for severe pronation. On the other hand Brooks Adrenaline is more comfortable and an all-around stability running shoe. From the support stand point, the Beast 20 provides more, but this makes it heavier and bulkier. Also, it is stiffer than Brooks Adrenaline GTS 22.
Both running shoes use GuideRails technology as the stability feature in their design. Considering their midsole foam, Adrenaline GTS 22 uses the softest foam ever designed by the Brooks, the DNA Loft. But, the Beast 20 uses BioMoGo DNA for the cushioning. The purpose of BioMoGo DNA is to create responsiveness. However, since the midsole design of Beast 20 is too thick it still lags behind Adrenaline GTS 22. To sum up our Brooks Beast vs Adrenaline comparison; Brooks Beast is thicker, bulkier but more supportive compared to the Brooks Adrenaline. But Adrenaline excels the Brooks Beast when it comes to comfort and all-day use.
Related Article: What is the Best Brooks Running Shoes for me?
Our Verdict for Brooks Beast 20 vs Adrenaline GTS 22
If you are seeking the best support for severe pronation, than the winner of Brooks Beast 20 vs Adrenaline GTS 22 comparison is the Beast.
It is good to note that the Beast 20 is a special running shoe who needs extra support on every stride. It is stiffer and bulkier than Adrenaline GTS 22. On the other hand, the Adrenaline GTS 22 is also a stability shoe, but offers less support compared to the Beast 20.
Also, Brooks Adrenaline is more comfortable compared to the Beast, and one of the most preferred running shoe in the Brooks family. Because, it has all the right proportions to be an everyday trainer in comparison to the Beast 20.
We recommend checking out Brooks Adrenaline GTS Review for further details on the Adrenaline series.
You can also consider checking out our “Best Running Shoes for Men & Women” article to get a clear picture of the great running shoes out there.
Brooks Beast 20
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 22
If you are not an injury prone runner, we would recommend Brooks Adrenaline GTS 22 over Brooks Beast 20. It fits the best for an everyday stability running shoe. However, if you have severe pronation or over-weighted than the best option out there is the Brooks Beast 20.
Brooks Beast 20 Short Review
The Beast 20 is designed specifically for the severe pronation or for the ones who needs extreme support. It is heavy and tough but material built quality is extremely sturdy. Yet, it is not as comfortable as the Adrenaline GTS 20.
Pros for Beast 20:
- The best option for severe pronation.
- Highly comfortable
- Includes GuideRails Holistic Support Feature
Cons for Beast 20:
- Bulky and Heavy
- Highly rigid compared to Adrenaline GTS
Bottom-line Brooks Beast vs Adrenaline:
Our verdict for Brooks Beast 20 vs Adrenaline GTS 22 (and Brooks Ariel 20 vs Adrenaline GTS 22), the Adrenaline uses DNA loft for the midsole cushioning. In the past generation, it was used to be encompassed with the BioMoGo DNA as well. But it has been removed recently in the GTS 22. The BioMoGo DNA tends to increase the responsiveness but compromise on the cushioning compared to DNA Loft. So, you can conclude that new Adrenaline GTS 22 is softer compared to its older generation. On the other hand, the Beast 20 features BioMoGo DNA foam in its midsole.
Here you can check the videos below to understand the main differences between Brooks DNA Loft vs BioMoGo:
Adrenaline’s DNA Loft:
As well as the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 22, the Beast 20 has also GuideRails holistic support system. This is the main stability feature that both running shoe use.
Down side of Beast is its groovy pattern, which gets dirty and attract debris easily. Both running shoes uses engineered mesh upper and they fit very well in this aspect.
The Brooks Beast 20 is a special running shoe; it has been designed for the severe pronation. On the other hand, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS is a go to shoe, it has stability features included, but you can consider it as an everyday cushioned running shoe.
The Beast is cushioned as well, however the midsole is too thick and the sole design is more stiff compared to the Adrenaline.
You may also like to see the Asics shoes. Here is the guide “Brooks vs Asics: Main Differences” which compares these two brands in many aspects.